PIP Canada Ltd is a 100% Canadian company, committed to protecting the workers who keep this country moving. Our high-performance PPE is designed and manufactured in Canada, ensuring quality, compliance, and reliability you can count on.
PIP Canada Ltd is a 100% Canadian company, committed to protecting the workers who keep this country moving. Our high-performance PPE is designed and manufactured in Canada, ensuring quality, compliance, and reliability you can count on.
PIP Canada Ltd is a 100% Canadian company, committed to protecting the workers who keep this country moving. Our high-performance PPE is designed and manufactured in Canada, ensuring quality, compliance, and reliability you can count on.
PIP Canada Ltd is a 100% Canadian company, committed to protecting the workers who keep this country moving. Our high-performance PPE is designed and manufactured in Canada, ensuring quality, compliance, and reliability you can count on.
Construction: Coated Seamless Knit, Reinforced Thumb Crotch, Touchscreen Compatible
Country of Origin: Sri Lanka
Sizes: XS-2XL
Packed: 6 Dozen/Case
A24X
A24X
Cut Level: A2 Test Method: ASTM F2992-15
Abrasion Level: 4 Test Method: ASTM D3389-10
ANSI/ISEA has released a new edition of the ANSI/ISEA 105 standard (2024 ed). The changes include a new standardized glove label for easier identification of key protection levels for both distributors and end-users. The new pentagon marking was created to simplify and standardize the identification of protective glove performance levels, including abrasion, cut, and puncture resistance. By consolidating this information into a single, easily recognizable label, it improves usability for workers and reduces the risk of selecting inadequate protection. Learn more.
The ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 standard outlines test methods for abrasion and is scored from 0-6. The ASTM D3389-10 is used for uncoated gloves and the end point (failure) is the number of abrasion cycles when the first thread or yarn is broken. The larger numbers of cycles indicates greater abrasion resistance of the product and a higher Abrasion Level.
4331BX
EN 388 2016 Results: 4331BX Abrasion: 4 Cut (Coupe Test): 3 Tear: 3 Puncture: 1 Cut (TDM-100 Test): B Impact Protection: X
EN 388 is a European Standard. Cut Level is determined by the number of cycles it takes a spinning circular blade, that is pulled across the material under a constant weight of 500 grams, to cut the fabric. As the number of cycles increase, so does the glove's ratings. Click here for more information about the EN 388 2016 standard.
Construction: Coated Seamless Knit, Reinforced Thumb Crotch, Touchscreen Compatible
Country of Origin: Sri Lanka
Sizes: XS-3XL
Packed: 72 Pair/Case
A23X
A23X
Cut Level: A2 Test Method: ASTM F2992-15
Abrasion Level: 3 Test Method: ASTM D3389-10
ANSI/ISEA has released a new edition of the ANSI/ISEA 105 standard (2024 ed). The changes include a new standardized glove label for easier identification of key protection levels for both distributors and end-users. The new pentagon marking was created to simplify and standardize the identification of protective glove performance levels, including abrasion, cut, and puncture resistance. By consolidating this information into a single, easily recognizable label, it improves usability for workers and reduces the risk of selecting inadequate protection. Learn more.
The ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 standard outlines test methods for abrasion and is scored from 0-6. The ASTM D3389-10 is used for uncoated gloves and the end point (failure) is the number of abrasion cycles when the first thread or yarn is broken. The larger numbers of cycles indicates greater abrasion resistance of the product and a higher Abrasion Level.
4331BX
EN 388 2016 Results: 4331BX Abrasion: 4 Cut (Coupe Test): 3 Tear: 3 Puncture: 1 Cut (TDM-100 Test): B Impact Protection: X
EN 388 is a European Standard. Cut Level is determined by the number of cycles it takes a spinning circular blade, that is pulled across the material under a constant weight of 500 grams, to cut the fabric. As the number of cycles increase, so does the glove's ratings. Click here for more information about the EN 388 2016 standard.
ANSI/ISEA has released a new edition of the ANSI/ISEA 105 standard (2024 ed). The changes include a new standardized glove label for easier identification of key protection levels for both distributors and end-users. The new pentagon marking was created to simplify and standardize the identification of protective glove performance levels, including abrasion, cut, and puncture resistance. By consolidating this information into a single, easily recognizable label, it improves usability for workers and reduces the risk of selecting inadequate protection. Learn more.
The ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 standard outlines test methods for abrasion and is scored from 0-6. The ASTM D3884-09 is used for uncoated gloves and the end point (failure) is the number of abrasion cycles when the first thread or yarn is broken. The larger numbers of cycles indicates greater abrasion resistance of the product and a higher Abrasion Level.
Puncture Level: 2 Test Method: ASTM F1342
The ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 blunt force puncture testing uses a probe to simulate a tear or burst hazard. The test measures the amount of force needed for a blunt probe to pierce through PPE material. Results are given in Newtons, which is converted into a 1-5 scale and spans from 10 newtons (Level 1) to 150+ newtons (Level 5) of puncture resistance.
Impact Level: 2
ANSI/ISEA 138 is a new, voluntary standard for the North American market designed to accurately classify different levels of impact protection offered by the impact-resistant gloves on the market. Click here for more information on our G-Tek Impact Series.
3X22F
EN 388 2016 Results: 3X22F Abrasion: 3 Cut (Coupe Test): X Tear: 2 Puncture: 2 Cut (TDM-100 Test): F Impact Protection:
EN 388 is a European Standard. Cut Level is determined by the number of cycles it takes a spinning circular blade, that is pulled across the material under a constant weight of 500 grams, to cut the fabric. As the number of cycles increase, so does the glove's ratings. Click here for more information about the EN 388 2016 standard.